Wednesday, April 24, 2013

A Great Debate #1: Ryback

We here at Keep The Noise Down want to introduce a new series of point/counterpoint columns where one brave soul will say YES YES YES and the other will say NO NO NO to a burning question from the world of sports or sports entertainment.

Our first debate: should Ryback be the #1 contender for the WWE Championship?




YES
by Nick Gator

In the aftermath of what some have described as a “passing of the torch” John Cena must now move forward to defend the WWE Championship. Making Ryback the first challenger to Cena after WrestleMania makes the most sense for a myriad of reasons.

This is a logical continuation of events that started months ago. Cena and Ryback have been circling one another. It was only a matter of time, particularly after the Royal Rumble match with the two of them as the final participants. If not for Cena, it would have been Ryback getting that coveted WrestleMania title match.

One thing you need for a good feud is the belief that the challenger poses a serious threat to the champion. Ryback can match or exceed Cena’s power and it is believable for him to get the win and the gold. Despite being in this persona for less than a year, the exposure that Ryback got in the final months of 2012 makes him a credible main event caliber opponent.

One knock on Ryback is his win-loss record. As my fellow broadcast journalist Corey Santiago says, it’s all about what people will pay to see. UFC fighter and motor mouth Chael Sonnen lost one title match and now gets another title match in another weight category while coaching on The Ultimate Fighter show. Sonnen gets those opportunities because he can bring in an audience and Ryback has that same potential.

Another issue for some is that Ryback only gets a crowd reaction because wrestling fans like to chant things. What? I said wrestling fans like to chant things. What? I said…IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT I SAID. YES YES YES. Dah Da Da Da Da Dah Da Da Dah Da. If it’s good enough for the likes of Steve Austin and The Rock, it’s only with me for the crowd to get behind Ryback’s catchphrase and help him become a recognizable figure in sports entertainment.

My belief has been supported by the latest work Ryback has done both on television and in social media. He has never had better promos or come off as potent as he’s had in the last few weeks. There is another dimension than just the lunkhead formerly known as Skip Sheffield that’s being captured.

Ryback’s tweets going after “Super Cena” included some below-the-belt remarks on Cena’s ex-wife. These have been deleted and even if he’s going into business for himself, that’s a good thing. It creates buzz within a fanbase that has no love for either of these superstars. Sometimes you need to stand out from the crowd and Ryback is doing just that on a level beyond his physical prowess.

Many fans complain there is a lack of new stars in WWE. Ryback as the #1 contender and the next WWE Champion can be a new star. There is no other person in the company more suited for this role at this time. 

Nick Gator is an award-winning cohost of the Future Endeavors wrestling show, live Sunday nights at 11pm eastern and available on-demand from Itunes and other outlets. In his spare time he buys domains and drops elbows on jackets. Tweet him @NickGator





NO
by AmplifiedToRock

If you were to ask a group of wrestling fans who grew up watching the pre-Attitude Era WWF/E what one of the most significant differences is between the product they watched as kids and the current product, a common answer would be that wrestling is no longer presented as a sport.  In those halcyon days of our youth, wins and losses carried weight.  Each victory was another step forward, each defeat a crushing impediment and a blow to the psyche.  Match after match, opponent after opponent, a wrestler had to earn his way to an opportunity to wrestle for one of the coveted gold belts worn by the man (or woman) who had reached the pinnacle and earned the right to call themselves the champion.

Then things began to change.  It began slowly, during the Monday Night Wars, with wrestling beginning to take a backseat to backstage antics and tomfoolery.  As the silliness and storylines became more prominent and the shift from wrestling to “sports entertainment” became more complete, the unavoidable side effect was a reduction in the importance of the “sport” of wrestling.  This includes the emphasis on wins and losses.

There is no better illustration of the current unimportance of wins and losses than Ryback.  After taking the WWE by storm by squashing one or more for weeks on end (ironically demonstrating just how strong a wrestler can appear by winning every single match), Ryback has lost in each of his six appearances on WWE pay-per-views.  Seemingly every time he has had an opportunity to go over on a big stage and take his place in the top tier of the current WWE roster, he has failed.  His most recent loss was on the grandest stage of them all, WrestleMania. 

Logically, the next step would be for Ryback to go back to the drawing board and try to build himself up again. 

Not in today’s WWE. 

The next night Ryback appeared on Monday Night Raw to declare himself the number one contender for John Cena’s WWE Championship.  If that wasn’t absurd enough, to get to Cena, he first went through Mark Henry, THE MAN HE LOST TO THE NIGHT BEFORE.

Ryback’s positioning as number one contender by WWE Creative is indicative of a larger problem, namely how do you make champions and championships matter when the results don’t mean anything?  But I’ll save that for another article.  There are a number of other reasons, aside from his not having “earned” it, that Ryback is not the guy to challenge John Cena for the WWE title. 

First of all, despite his great look, Ryback is not the best worker.  Even in a gimmick match, as the match at Extreme Rules will almost certainly be, he doesn’t have the ability to tell a great story for a longer period of time.  Combine his lack of ability with Cena, who isn’t the greatest worker himself, and you have the makings of a rather lackluster match.

Then you have the candidates who are more deserving and much more talented.  First, you’ve got young super talents such as Antonio Cesaro who, despite being booked to look like a fool with a yodeling gimmick in recent weeks, has the heat and skill to make an excellent opponent for Cena.  You also have Mark Henry who, and this is intentional repetition, BEAT RYBACK AT WRESTLEMANIA.  He’s been around the block and is every bit the dominating powerhouse that Ryback is.  It just makes so much more sense psychologically for him to get the title shot, especially as he’s probably making one his final laps around the circuit.  He’s also better than Ryback in another crucial area:  crowd heat.

You have an audience that isn’t sure what to make of Ryback.  Though it wasn’t botched quite as badly as Alberto Del Rio’s face turn, Ryback turning heel was not executed particularly well.  Having him attack the company’s biggest face would usually be a great way to generate heat, but he did it at the IZOD Center on the night after WrestleMania in front of the most anti-Cena crowd the WWE could possibly have.  Though Michael Cole and Jerry Lawler tried to sell it as a reprehensible action, the crowd on hand ate it up.  

Another problem is his “FEED ME MORE” chant, which I have sworn was the only thing about Ryback that was truly over.  The crowd still loves it, even though he is making a concerted effort not to use it.  (Note to WWE Creative:  Maybe it’s time for new music?)  He’s still not getting a lot of heat. 

The problem?   More than likely it’s because all he has done when there is really something on the line is lose, so the audience doesn’t really believe he can beat John Cena with the most prestigious title in the company at stake. 

It’s not his time yet.  Start over and let him build his way back to the top and give him a steady diet of meaningful wins.  Do the same thing across the board.  In so doing, they won’t just be building a legitimate contender, they’ll be giving us compelling television.

The artist known as Amplified To Rock is an American citizen despite his love of soccer, hockey, and Japanese wrestling. Keep The Noise Down is his brainchild and he never draws into an inside straight. Tweet with him @AmplifiedToRock.

Saturday, April 20, 2013

NBA Playoffs: Breaking Down the 1st Round

By Aaron the Brain

The NBA Playoffs start today, so here's how I see the first round panning out...

EASTERN CONFERENCE
(1) Miami vs (8) Milwaukee

Regular Season Series: Miami won 3-1

Summary: There's a reason you would have to bet $20,000 on Miami to win $100. Aside from being the prohibitive favorite to win it all, Miami is better than Milwaukee in virtually every category. They even have a better rebound rate. Milwaukee's only chance is to win turnovers, rebounds, and 3's. Even still, I don't like their chances to win more than a game.

Prediction: Miami in 4.

(2) New York vs (7) Boston
Regular Season: Knicks won 3-1

Summary: The Knicks haven't won a playoff series in 13 years, but this is the first time in that span that they've been the favorites. Boston is never an easy out, though, and if the Knicks don't defend and learn how to pass the ball they will be in for a dog fight. Ultimately, if Carmelo keeps shooting the way he has over the last few weeks, the Knicks probably have too much scoring for Boston to keep up with, but don't count out the Celtics.

Prediction: Knicks in 7.

(3) Indiana vs (6) Atlanta

Regular Season: Tied 2-2

Summary: For a while there, the Pacers were making a case for being called elite. In a span of 28 games from the end of January to the beginning of April, they won 22 of 28 games. Then they proceeded to limp down the stretch and fall short of 50 wins. Still, Indiana is certainly a threat to make a deep run in the playoffs. They led the league in both defensive efficiency and rebound rate. Atlanta was also a top-10 defensive team, but was one of the worst rebounding teams in the league this season. Both teams are marginal, at best, offensively, so I expect this to be a series of low-scoring games, despite them having some higher scoring games in the regular season series. If there's one area Atlanta may have an advantage, it's shooting 3's. Atlanta was 7th in the league in 3-point percentage in the regular season, shooting 37%, and in the 4 games against Indiana this season, they averaged 8 threes a game at 38%. Still, I like the Pacers' defense and rebounding.

Prediction: Pacers in 6.

(4) Brooklyn vs. (5) Chicago

Regular Season: Bulls win 3-1

Summary: The Bulls took 3 of 4 in the regular season, but all but one of the 4 games came were tight, and that's how I expect this series to play out. This is a classic matchup of offense vs. defense, as the Nets have a top-10 offense and the Bulls have a top-5 defense. Furthermore, both teams are really good rebounding teams as well, neither team shoots the 3 particularly well, and both teams are relatively similar in turnover ratio. So, this one will come down simply to which team makes shots at the end of games. Brooklyn, with Joe Johnson, Derron Williams, and Brook Lopez probably have an edge there.

Prediction: Nets in 7.

WESTERN CONFERENCE
(1) Oklahoma City vs (8) Houston
Regular Season: Thunder wins 2-1

Summary: This is billed as James Harden vs. his old team, and that will make this fun to watch, but the only chance Houston has is if Harden's teammates give him a considerable amount of help. Omer Asik is probably the most important piece of Houston's supporting cast, because Houston will need to win the battle on the boards. Still, this will likely be a series played at a break-neck pace with lots of scoring, and while Houston enjoys that pace, it actually favors OKC more, because they are the more efficient team.

Prediction: Thunder win in 5.

(2) San Antonio vs. (7) LA Lakers

Regular Season: Spurs win 2-1

Summary: It appears that both Steve Nash and Manu Ginobli will play in Game 1. It will be interesting to see how the Lakers look without Kobe, but with Nash, Howard, and Gasol. The Spurs won 2 of the 3 matchups in the regular season, but the Lakers won a must-win game last week without Kobe or Nash. With Nash, Howard, and Gasol running pick n' rolls all over the floor, the Lakers may have a shot in this series. The question is whether they can play enough defense over the course of the series. The Spurs aren't without their own questions. Neither Parker or Ginobli appear to be 100% coming into the series, and Duncan will have his hands full against Howard and Gasol. Kawhi Leonard may be the key to the series.

Prediction: Spurs in 6.

(3) Denver vs (6) Golden State
Regular Season: Nuggets win 3-1

Summary: These are two of the most fun teams to watch in the entire league, so I am looking forward to watching this one. Injuries are definitely hindering the Nuggets, though. Already without Danilo Galinari for the rest of the season, Kenneth Faried's status is also in doubt. That could level the playing field in an area where Denver has one of it's biggest advantages - offensive rebounding. If Faried isn't at 100%, Golden State may actually be the better rebounding team. Ty Lawson is also coming off an injury, and says he's 100% despite not playing much over the last few weeks. Look for Golden State to let it fly from beyond the arc, led by Steph Curry. The Warriors shot over 40% from 3 this season, and if they are gonna pull the upset, that will be the key.

Prediction: Nuggets in 7.

(4) LA Clippers vs (5) Memphis

Regular Season: Clippers win 3-1

Summary: Both of these teams enter the playoffs with championship aspirations, and one will exit with a bitter first round defeat. Last year the two played to a 7-game series, which the Clippers came away with. Both teams play great defense, but the Clippers are far and away better offensively, despite Memphis' improved play since the Rudy Gay trade. The question is whether Memphis has a guy to go to in the crunch. We know the Clippers can go to Chris Paul, and ultimately that's the difference.

Prediction: Clippers in 7.